Användning av cookies

Lunds universitet använder cookies för att se till att webbplatsen fungerar korrekt och för att förbättra din upplevelse.

Läs mer i vår cookiepolicy

Sökresultat

Filtrera

Nollställ filter

Filtyp

Din sökning på "*" gav 1017 sökträffar

Filosofiska institutionen - Lunds universitet

Filosofiska institutionen - Lunds universitet | Filosofiska institutionen Våra utbildningar   Praktisk filosofi   Teoretisk filosofi   Kognitionsvetenskap   Förra Nästa Tidigare studenter på master-programmet i kognitionsvetenskap Vad jobbar de med idag?   Information till dig som är ny student Nyfiken på studier? Läs om dina rättigheter och ditt ansvar som student Nyheter Fler nyheter 2026-01-12

https://www.fil.lu.se/ - 2026-01-12

Reasoning and Representing

Reasoning and Representing 1 Pufendorf Lectures 2025: Vocabularies of Reason Handout for Lecture I Reasoning and Representing Bob Brandom Full Disclosure: These lectures are shamelessly promoting some of the ideas developed in more detail in the book: Ulf Hlobil and Robert Brandom, Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons: Pragmatics, Semantics, and Conceptual Roles, [Routledge, 2024]. Gilbert Harman:

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Handout_for_Lecture_1_Reasoning_and_Representing.pdf - 2026-01-13

Logic and the Structure of Reasons

Logic and the Structure of Reasons 1 Pufendorf Lectures 2025: Vocabularies of Reason Handout for Lecture II Logic and the Structure of Reasons Bob Brandom I. The Structure of Reason Relations What is the relation between material reason relations of implication and incompatibility and formal logical relations of consequence and inconsistency? The former includes implications such as Pittsburgh is

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Handout_for_Lecture_2_Logic_and_the_Structure_of_Reasons.pdf - 2026-01-13

Roles and Reasons Handout

Roles and Reasons Handout 1 Pufendorf Lectures 2025: Vocabularies of Reason Handout for Lecture III: Roles and Reasons Bob Brandom A vocabulary is a pair of a lexicon L, which is a set of sentences, and distinguished set I of pairs of sets of sentences of L. I means that the implication with premises X and conclusion Y is a good one. Premise-sets are read conjunctively, and conclusion-

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Handout_for_Lecture_3_Roles_and_Reasons.pdf - 2026-01-13

1 Reasoning and Representing

1 Reasoning and Representing 6 May 15, 2025 Vocabularies of Reason 2025 Pufendorf Lectures Lund University Lecture I Reasoning and Representing Bob Brandom I. Semantics and Pragmatics When I say that cats are mammals, we can distinguish between what I have said— something sayable, namely that cats are mammals—and my saying of it, which is something I have done, a speech act I have performed. Of co

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Lecture_1.pdf - 2026-01-13