Sökresultat

PowerPoint-presentation 2014-03-28 1 Föreläsning 9 Kontraktsteorin 2 Den historiskt mest kände förespråkaren för kontraktsteorin om moralen är Thomas Hobbes, 1600-talets främste brittiske filosof Hobbes var influerad av den (tidiga) moderna vetenskapen och intog ett vetenskapligt perspektiv på moral (och politik) Han förkastade den antika, teleologiska världsbilden (förknippad med bl.a. Aristot

https://www.fil.lu.se/media/utbildning/dokument/kurser/FPRA11/20141/Bergstrm_Rachels_9_kontraktsteorin_.pdf - 2026-04-14

I NS I KT OCH H A N DL I NG INS I KT OCH HANDLI NG Utgiven av Hans Larsson Samfundet Volym 23 Temanummer om vetenskapligt ethos i efterkrigstidens Sverige gästredaktörer victoria höög & anna tunlid redaktör: bo hanson erik dahlbergsgatan 32 411 26 göteborg tryckt med bidrag från erik och gurli hultengrens fond för filosofi tryckning: preses nams, riga 2010 produktion: laserna & laserna isbn 978-91

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Insikt_och_handling_vol._23_-_2010.pdf - 2026-04-13

C:\Documents and Settings\sobel\My Documents\D Drive\DataflsActive\Gd_Gld\Gd_Gld13forWlodek.wpd 1This is Chapter XI of Good and Gold: a Judgmental History of Metaethics from G. E. Moore through J. L. Mackie. Files for this work-in-perennial-progress, including a file of References for citations in chapters, are linked to a web page the URL of which is http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/%7Esobel/Gd_Gld. 2

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/SobelHoward.pdf - 2026-04-14

If there are positive facts, there are negative facts IF YOU BELIEVE IN POSITIVE FACTS, YOU SHOULD BELIEVE IN NEGATIVE FACTS* Gunnar Björnsson Department of Philosophy, Göteborg University gunnar.bjornsson@filosofi.gu.se ABSTRACT: Substantial metaphysical theory has long struggled with the question of negative facts, facts capable of making it true that Valerie isn’t vigorous. This paper argues th

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/BjornssonGunnar.pdf - 2026-04-14

Filosofins historia: Tentamen (100 poäng) Höst 2025 G: 50-74 poäng VG: 75-100 poäng OBS! Skriv dina svar så tydligt som möjligt. Det är diF ansvar aF se Gll aF läraren kan läsa din handsGl. Tema 1: FörsokraGker Gll Aristoteles (25 poäng) Fråga 1.1 (välj endast en fråga av a och b; svara med 5 Gll 10 rader; 5 poäng) a) Redogör för Anaximandros apeiron b) Redogör för Parmenides ’det varande’ Fråga 1

https://www.fil.lu.se/media/utbildning/dokument/kurser/FTEA13/20261/Exempeltentor_VT26_teoretisk_filosofi_grundkurs.pdf - 2026-04-14

Infinite regress – virtue or vice Printed from: Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz. Ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson & D. Egonsson, 2007. www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek 1 Infinite Regress – Virtue or Vice?* Anna-Sofia Maurin Lund University Infinite regress arguments are interesting for several reasons. They feature prominently in the philosophic

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/MaurinAnnaSofia.pdf - 2026-04-14

Phil 760 Printed from: Homage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz. Eds. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson & D. Egonssson, 2007. www.fil.lu.se/HomageaWlodek Happiness and Subjective Desire Satisfaction: Wayne Davis’s Theory of Happiness* Fred Feldman University of Massachusetts at Amherst ffeldman@philos.umass.edu ABSTRACT: There is a lively debate about the

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/FeldmanFred.pdf - 2026-04-14

Printed from: Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz. Ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson & D. Egonsson, 2007. www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek Semantics and the Justification of Deductive Inference∗ Ebba Gullberg ebba.gullberg@philos.umu.se Sten Lindstr̈om sten.lindstrom@philos.umu.se Ume̊a University Abstract Is it possible to give a justification of ou

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/Gullberg&Lindstrom.pdf - 2026-04-14

3 Roles and Reasons 7 Vocabularies of Reason 2025 Pufendorf Lectures Lund University Lecture III Roles and Reasons I. Introduction The main aim of my first two lectures was to put on the table the concept of reason relations of implication and incompatibility, and to show how that topic appears from the points of view afforded by different ways of talking about it. From the vantage point of bilate

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Lecture_3.pdf - 2026-04-14

Common sense psychology and scientific explanation Common sense psychology and scientific explanation Frederick Stoutland Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University Fred.Stoutland@filosofi.uu.se ABSTRACT: In his recent book, Teleological Realism, Scott Sehon defends a teleological account of explanations in common sense psychology [CSP], arguing that if such explanations were causal, CSP would b

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/StoutlandFrederick.pdf - 2026-04-14

1 Reasoning and Representing 6 May 15, 2025 Vocabularies of Reason 2025 Pufendorf Lectures Lund University Lecture I Reasoning and Representing Bob Brandom I. Semantics and Pragmatics When I say that cats are mammals, we can distinguish between what I have said— something sayable, namely that cats are mammals—and my saying of it, which is something I have done, a speech act I have performed. Of co

https://www.fil.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/pufendorf/Files/Lecture_1.pdf - 2026-04-14

Microsoft Word - SJSI WR-Festschrift2.doc Printed from: Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz. Ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson & D. Egonsson, 2007. www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek 1 IS HYPOTHETICAL CONSENT A SUBSTITUTE FOR ACTUAL CONSENT? Linus Broström & Mats Johansson Department of Medical Ethics, Lund University Department of Philosophy, Lund Uni

https://www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek/site/papper/Brostrom&Johansson.pdf - 2026-04-14